Impersonation cases are judged on identity artifacts: sender details, URLs, scripts, and the exact instruction that induced payment or access.
Scammers pretend to be a bank, exchange, agency, or company to create urgency and authority.
Impersonation scam disputes require clear documentation of who the scammer pretended to be, how they communicated, and what instruction induced payment. Our reports structure identity artifacts, communication patterns, and payment evidence into proof-mapped timelines reviewers can verify.
How impersonation scams work
Capture sender identity
Preserve scripts and pressure
Payment redirection evidence
Need help organizing your evidence into a structured report? Contact us today for a free consultation to explore your options and develop an investigative plan.
Everything you need to know about our investigation services and recovery process.